Walter Roesch IV

Walter J. Roesch IV, Esq

Associate Attorney
Phone: 718-878-3781
Office Location : New York City Metropolitan Area

Walter J. Roesch IV is an experienced New York attorney with more than fifteen years of legal practice representing individuals and families throughout New York City and the surrounding metropolitan area. Throughout his career, Mr. Roesch has built a reputation for aggressive advocacy, meticulous preparation, and unwavering dedication to achieving the best possible results for his clients. He understands that legal matters are often among the most important and stressful events in a person’s life, and he is committed to providing clear guidance, strategic representation, and personal attention every step of the way.

As the founder and managing attorney of the Law Office of Walter J. Roesch IV, Mr. Roesch oversees all aspects of the firm’s operations while maintaining an active litigation practice. He personally handles client matters from the initial consultation through final resolution, ensuring that every client receives individualized representation tailored to their unique circumstances. His practice has encompassed a broad range of legal matters, including criminal defense, family law, divorce, custody disputes, child support proceedings, orders of protection, and complex litigation.

Since June 2025, Mr. Roesch has also served as an attorney with the Law Office of Robert Tsigler, where he handles all types of criminal matters throughout New York. In that role, he represents clients facing misdemeanor and felony charges, conducts court appearances, negotiates with prosecutors, prepares and argues motions, and advocates vigorously for favorable outcomes both in and out of the courtroom. His criminal defense experience allows him to provide strategic, results-driven representation to individuals facing serious legal challenges.

Prior to establishing his own practice, Mr. Roesch served as an attorney and partner with several respected New York law firms. As a Partner at Goldberg & Cohn, LLP and later as an Associate at Angiuli & Gentile, LLP, he handled a diverse caseload involving family law, criminal defense, workers’ compensation, personal injury, and matrimonial matters. He regularly appeared in Supreme Court, Family Court, and Criminal Court throughout all five boroughs of New York City, conducted hearings and trials, defended and conducted depositions, and represented clients in high-stakes and high-net-worth matters.

Mr. Roesch earned his Juris Doctor from Brooklyn Law School and was admitted to
practice law in the State of New York in 2011. He also holds a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from Union College in Schenectady, New York.

Clients choose Walter J. Roesch because of his hands-on approach, accessibility, and commitment to fighting for their interests. Whether facing criminal charges, navigating a difficult family dispute, or confronting a complex legal issue, clients can expect knowledgeable counsel, responsive communication, and determined advocacy. His goal is simple: to protect his clients’ rights, minimize their stress, and achieve the strongest possible outcome in every case.

Experience

Mr. Roesch’s practice focuses on litigation, courtroom advocacy, and client-centered representation. He has extensive experience handling criminal defense matters, contested family court proceedings, divorce litigation, custody disputes, orders of protection, and commercial litigation. His background includes motion practice, evidentiary hearings, trials, depositions, settlement negotiations, and complex case management.

Practice Areas

Criminal Defense
Family Law
Divorce and Matrimonial Law
Child Custody and Child Support
Orders of Protection
Family Offense Proceedings
Domestic Violence Defense
Felony and Misdemeanor Defense
DWI/DUI Defense
Personal Injury
Workers’ Compensation
Commercial Litigation
Contract Disputes
General Civil Litigation

Education

Brooklyn Law School, Juris Doctor
Admitted to the New York State Bar
Union College, Bachelor of Arts in Political Science

Bar Admission

New York State Bar (2011)
US Supreme Court 2016

CASE RESULTS

Resolved a Multimillion-dollar theft, with a plea to time served and no probation, in Queens County.
Resolved D Felony where the original offer was fie years jail with a misdemeanor plea, with no jail time, In Brooklyn.
Resolved a D Felony in Queens with an outright dismissal.
Multiple drug charges, dropped to disorderly conduct in Nassau County.
Robbery, and assault against police dropped to Petit Larceny, in five days, in Queens, New York.

Proven Results: 2026 Case Victories Handled by Walter J. Roesch IV, Esq.

Case & Representation	Case Details & Strategy	Final Outcome
Assault (initially including a top count D felony involving alleged use of a weapon), aggravated harassment, and related domestic violence–classified charges Kings County Criminal Court (Brooklyn) and Queens Criminal Court, New York Timeline: ~5 Months	The Stakes: Serious assault allegations across two separate dockets in different counties, including a D felony charge involving alleged use of a weapon (a belt). Potential incarceration, a felony record, full stay-away orders of protection, and significant reputational harm. Active I-Card in Queens at the time of Brooklyn arraignment. The Strategy: Appeared at arraignment in both counties, secured release on recognizance, and managed simultaneous court calendars. Closely monitored compliance with discovery obligations and Certificate of Compliance requirements in both matters. Where supporting documentation and meaningful discovery were lacking—including absence of medical records and corroborating evidence—tracked statutory speedy trial time under CPL §30.30 and opposed adjournments that would toll includable time.	Both cases were dismissed pursuant to CPL §30.30 for failure to prosecute within the required statutory timeframe.
Grand larceny (felony) Kings County Criminal Court, Brooklyn, New York Timeline: ~6 Months	The Stakes: Felony charges that could have resulted in indictment, a permanent criminal record, and potential incarceration. The Strategy: Appeared at arraignment, secured release without bail, and monitored the case through the grand jury process. Leveraged key facts, including that the complainant recovered the property and did not wish to proceed, while holding the prosecution to its obligation to timely indict.	The case was dismissed after the prosecution failed to obtain an indictment within the required timeframe.
Outstanding warrant related to a prior summons (public urination violation) Kings County Criminal Court, Brooklyn, New York Timeline: ~2–3 Weeks	The Stakes: An active warrant discovered during a background check, exposing the client to possible arrest, court detention, and complications with employment opportunities. The Strategy: Investigated the warrant, confirmed it stemmed from an old summons, and coordinated a voluntary return to court to avoid arrest. Guided the client through the process and appeared to resolve the matter efficiently.	The warrant was vacated, and the case was resolved with a 30-day Adjournment in Contemplation of Dismissal (ACD).
Multiple felony drug charges (possession and alleged sale of a controlled substance) Nassau County Criminal Court, New York Timeline: ~4–5 Months	The Stakes: The client faced multiple felony charges carrying potential prison time, a permanent criminal record, and serious long-term consequences. The Strategy: Reviewed discovery, challenged the strength of the prosecution’s case, and pursued a treatment-based resolution. Negotiated extensively to reduce the charges and avoid felony prosecution.	All felony charges were reduced to disorderly conduct (a non-criminal violation) with community service. No criminal conviction resulted.
Assault (misdemeanor) Kings County Criminal Court, Brooklyn, New York Timeline: ~2–3 Months	The Stakes: Misdemeanor assault charges that could have resulted in a criminal conviction, jail time, and a permanent record, along with an active order of protection and employment consequences. The Strategy: Negotiated with the prosecution and secured a diversionary resolution, avoiding trial and minimizing long-term consequences.	The case was resolved with a 6-month Adjournment in Contemplation of Dismissal (ACD) with a full order of protection.
Assault, criminal contempt, and related offenses Kings County Criminal Court, Brooklyn, New York Timeline: ~12–13 Months	The Stakes: The client faced multiple charges, including assault and violations of an order of protection, with potential jail exposure and a permanent criminal record. The Strategy: Guided the client through a compliance-based resolution, ensuring completion of required programming and addressing allegations of non-compliance raised by the prosecution.	The case was resolved with a non-criminal violation following proof of completed programming. No further court appearances were required.
Petit larceny (shoplifting) Queens Criminal Court, New York Timeline: 1 Day	The Stakes: The client faced a misdemeanor theft charge involving approximately $750 in merchandise, with potential criminal conviction, fines, and a permanent record. The Strategy: Negotiated directly with the prosecution at arraignment, presenting mitigating factors including the client’s personal circumstances and restitution already made to the store.	The case was resolved at arraignment with a plea to disorderly conduct (a non-criminal violation) and a $250 fine.
Grand larceny, scheme to defraud, forged instrument charges, and related financial fraud allegations Queens County Supreme Court, New York Timeline: ~6 Months	The Stakes: Multiple serious felony charges tied to an alleged multi-million-dollar fraud scheme, with potential exposure to lengthy state prison time, restitution claims exceeding $3 million, asset forfeiture, and possible federal investigation. The Strategy: Reviewed extensive financial discovery, negotiated directly with prosecutors over restitution amounts, coordinated the recovery and return of funds, and structured a plea agreement designed to avoid lengthy incarceration. Addressed forfeiture issues, protected family interests where possible, and secured an agreement below maximum exposure.	The client pled guilty to a reduced D felony and was sentenced to 120 days in jail, along with restitution, avoiding a substantially longer prison sentence.
Assault in the Second Degree (violent felony) Kings County Supreme Court, Brooklyn, New York Timeline: ~2 Years	The Stakes: Violent felony assault charge carrying potential state prison time, probation, and a permanent felony record. The Strategy: Pursued mitigation, negotiated with prosecutors for an alternative-to-incarceration resolution, and guided the client through interim probation, community service, and compliance programming. Prepared for suppression and identification hearings while continuing negotiations for a non-criminal outcome.	After successful completion of all conditions, the court vacated the client’s felony assault plea and reduced the case to Disorderly Conduct, a non-criminal violation.
Assault in the Third Degree (domestic violence misdemeanor) Kings County Criminal Court, Brooklyn, New York Timeline: ~4 Months	The Stakes: Misdemeanor domestic violence charges that could have resulted in jail time, probation, a criminal record, and a full order of protection. The Strategy: Coordinated the client’s voluntary surrender, secured release without bail at arraignment, and challenged the prosecution’s readiness throughout the case. Rejected plea offers that would have required admissions and compliance conditions, instead preparing the case for hearings and trial.	The case was dismissed in the interest of justice before trial.
Assault (domestic violence misdemeanor) New York County Criminal Court, Manhattan, New York Timeline: ~3 Months	The Stakes: Misdemeanor assault charges that could have resulted in jail time, probation, a criminal record, and professional consequences affecting his career as a pilot. The Strategy: Obtained cooperation from the complainant, pursued dismissal options, and monitored the prosecution’s failure to timely proceed with the case. Rejected an unfavorable resolution that included an order of protection and positioned the matter for dismissal on speedy trial grounds.	The case was dismissed pursuant to CPL §30.30 and sealed.